Why the United States is Not a Democracy
The United States is not
a Democracy? What an outrageous claim to make! Or so it would seem...
In fact, the United
States of America is actually a Republic. The other terms bandied about amongst
political scientists are "Representative Democracy" and
"Constitutional Republic". And this isn't just a dictionary-zealot
splitting hairs here; there are very important distinctions between a pure
Democracy and what we have in the USA. And confusing the issue can actually
lead to gross mistakes.
For instance, in the
2000 Presidential election, if you (hypothetically) didn't like George Bush but
didn't trust Al Gore, you might have cast a vote for Ralph Nader on the belief
that you were at least voting against the other two candidates. In fact, what
you actually did was throw your vote away, because of the Electoral College
system. Each state has a certain number of electoral votes, and the candidate
who gets the most votes in a state gets all the electoral votes for that state,
even if they only win by one vote.
Your electorate would
have just counted the votes in your precinct until a clear winner emerged, then
gone to the Electoral College and voted for the winner. That's what it boiled
down to: one vote from each precinct. A vote for Ralph Nader did not cancel out
a vote for George Bush.
In the more general
scheme of things, the United States is a Republic because we have a
representative government. Individual citizens do not get to directly vote on
every detail, from whether we go to war to whether we have a seat-belt law. All
we can do with a vote is appoint Congress members, Governors, Mayors, Senators,
and yes, Presidents, too.
Once elected, those
representatives can do whatever they please. They can say whatever they want
when they campaign to get elected, but after you've voted them in, they aren't
bound to represent you in the slightest. You can get them impeached for
breaking a law or an oath of office, but there is no specific rule that says
they have to keep every promise they made when they got elected.
Furthermore, in a direct
democracy, the laws which are passed must be obeyed. In a Republic, the laws
get interpreted by a third branch, which is the Judicial System. The court is
free to throw out, rule against, or even just ignore a law if it finds the case
is just and the law unfair. This is why everybody who commits adultery in
California isn't in jail - there is a law against that, though, but it's
ignored.
You're probably asking
yourself, why is it that we don't have a direct democracy, then? Well, when the
country was founded a mere 230 years ago, the device you're reading this on
hadn't been invented yet. The same goes for cars, telephones, television,
telegraphs, and radio. Where was communication technology when the Declaration
of Independence was signed? The Gutenberg printing press. Ships on the ocean
were sending signals by firing cannons and raising flags. On land, we had pen,
paper, and the Pony Express.
Now imagine how long it
would take to get anything done if we were to insist on collecting the informed
opinion of every single citizen across the country in order to do every single
thing, using only letters delivered by horse. You're right, it would be
impossible!
You might now ask,
"Well, now we can transmit information everywhere at the speed of
electricity. Why can't we change to a direct democracy and throw out all of
this red tape?" Not so fast! There are experimental ideas being tossed
around about this already - one of them is the Unity08 party and another one is
the National initiative to allow for ballot initiatives at the Federal level,
being proposed by Congressman Mike Gravel, who is running for President in
2008.
However, even the
boldest of these isn't proposing to implement a pure and full Direct Democracy
right away. Do you, as a citizen, want to travel the world meeting with foreign
leaders to decide if you want to do business with them or grant their request
for aid? Would you have had the time to read every page of the hundreds of
bills passed by Congress last year? And most of these on trivial matters such
as how much funding to grant a program, what to name a bridge, whose face goes
on the next commemorative coin, or who to appoint to the Spotted Owl
Conservation Commission.
There's a lot to
organizing ourselves as a group of 300 million people than you'd at first
think. Simply put, we aren't built like ants or bees; nature didn't intend for
us to act as a hive-mind. Humans are great in small groups, but even getting
all of us together, such as in a Nationwide census or even in the Board of
Directors at a corporation, is beyond us. Humans don't scale.
Humans don't scale.
That's why we have the closest thing to a Direct Democracy - a Constitutional
Republic!
Post a Comment